सरोगसीच्या कायद्यासाठी महाराष्ट्र सरकार तज्ज्ञ समितीची स्थापना करणार

आमदार देवेंद्र फडणवीस यांनी शुक्रवारी (१३ जुलै, २०१२) विधान सभेत महाराष्ट्र साहाय्यक प्रजनन तंत्रज्ञान (नियमन) अधिनियम २०११ (सरोगसी) आणि लोक आयुक्त व उप लोक आयुक्त कायदा, १९७१ (सुधारणा) या दोन अशासकीय विधेयकांवर चर्चा करून या विधेयकाची आवश्यकता पटवून दिली. आमदार फडणवीस यांच्या चर्चेनंतर मान. राज्यमंत्री फौजिया खान यांनी महाराष्ट्र साहाय्यक प्रजनन तंत्रज्ञान (नियमन) अधिनियम, २०११ (सरोगसी) याची तांत्रिक मुद्द्यांद्वारे तपासणी करण्यासाठी तसेच साहाय्यक प्रजनन तंत्रज्ञानातील विविध पैलूंचा अभ्यास करण्यासाठी तज्ज्ञ समितीची स्थापना करण्याचे आश्वासन दिले आहे. तसेच केंद्र सरकारने २००८ पासून संसदेत प्रलंबित असलेला हा कायदा लवकरात लवकर पारित करण्यात यावा, यासाठी केंद्र सरकारला पत्र लिहिणार असल्याचेही राज्यमंत्री फौजिया खान यांनी सांगितले.
लोक आयुक्त व उप लोक आयुक्त कायदा, १९७१ (सुधारणा) या कायद्याबाबत अधिवेशन संपण्यापूर्वी मुख्यमंत्र्यांसमवेत चर्चा करून त्यावर योग्य तो मार्ग काढण्याचे आश्वासन राज्यमंत्री फौजिया खान यांनी दिले आहे.
या दोन्ही अशासकीय विधेयकाचा मसुदा 'स्पार्क'ने तयार केला होता. इच्छुकांना सदर विधेयक पहावयाचे असल्यास ते ब्लॉगवर उपलब्ध आहे. या विधेयकाबाबत आपल्या काही साधक-बाधक प्रतिक्रिया असल्यास आम्हास जरूर कळवाव्यात.

सरोगसीतील गैरप्रकारांना बसणार आळा

वृत्तसंस्था,  नवी दिल्ली
सरोगसी तंत्रज्ञानाचा वापर करून कृत्रिम गर्भधारणेसाठी गर्भाशय भाड्याने देणारी महिला आणि जन्मणाऱ्या मुलाचे हक्क डावलले जाऊ नयेत यासाठी केंद्र सरकारने महत्त्वाचे पाऊल उचलले आहे. येत्या हिवाळी अधिवेशनात त्यासंदर्भात एक विधेयक आणण्यात येणार आहे.
सरोगसीची सेवा घेणाऱ्या संबंधित जोडप्याच्या सामाजिक , वैद्यकीय आणि नैतिक अधिकारांचे रक्षण करण्यासंदर्भात या विधेयकात तरतुदी आहेत. द असिस्टेड रिप्रॉडक्टिव टेक्नॉलॉजी रेग्युलेशन (एआरटी) असे या विधेयकाचे नाव असून ते कायदा मंत्रालयाकडे मंजुरीसाठी पाठवण्यात आले आहे. या विधेयकानुसार अशा गुन्ह्यांसाठी पाच वर्षांचा तुरुंगवास आणि मोठ्या दंडाची तरतूद करण्यात आली आहे.
नव्या विधेयकानुसार ज्या देशांत सरोगसीवर बंदी आहे अशा देशातील जोडप्यांना भारतात ही सेवा घेता येणार नाही , अशी माहिती वैद्यकीय संशोधन सचिव व्ही. एम. कटोच यांनी दिली. परदेशी जोडप्यांना ही सेवा देणाऱ्या संस्थांकडून जन्मलेल्या मुलांना संबंधित देशांचे नागरिकत्व मिळेल अशा अर्थाचे प्रतीज्ञापत्र घेतले जाईल. ऑस्ट्रेलिया , जपान , फ्रान्स , जर्मनीसह अनेक युरोपिअन देशांमध्ये सरोगसीवर बंदी आहे. ' युके ' मध्ये सरोगसीसाठी गर्भाशय वापरण्यास देताना बदल्यात पैसे घेता येत नाहीत. सरोगसीतून जन्मलेल्या अनेक मुलांना संबंधित देशांनी नागरिकत्व नाकारल्याने भारतात त्यांच्या नागरिकत्वाचे प्रश्न निर्माण झाले आहेत.

17-yr-old egg donor dead, HC questions fertility centre’s role

Mumbai (Indian Express, Mayura Janwalkar) :
Not much is known about Sushma Pandey’s death, except that she was 17 years old, died suddenly and had visited a fertility clinic just two days earlier — at least the third time she was doing so in 18 months.
Now, almost two years after she died, Sushma’s case may bring under the spotlight the hushed world in which India’s assisted reproductive clinics operate — the brief, vacuous Bollywood shine upon them after Vicky Donor notwithstanding.
Allowing the discharge plea filed by the man blamed by Sushma’s mother Pramila for her death, Bombay High Court recently pulled up the police for not probing the role of the hospital in the circumstances that led to her death.
“Curiously, the chargesheet does not show that the investigating machinery had proceeded against Rotunda Hospital, which has a record of the victim being an egg donor on three occasions prior to the unfortunate incident, in flagrant violation of the requirement that such a donor has to be between the ages of 18 years and 35 years, when the victim was only 17 years on the last occasion... and she had been donating eggs for at least one-and-a-half years before this,” observed Justice R C Chavan.
The person who is alleged to have taken Sushma to the clinic the last time, Samaullah alias Shanu, is also booked in the case. His discharge plea is pending before a sessions court.
Investigations by officers of the Saki Naka police station revealed that Sushma had been going to ‘Rotunda — The Centre for Human Reproduction’ in Bandra as an egg or oocyte donor, and had visited the hospital in February 2009, October 2009 and possibly February 2010. Hospital records also indicate that Sushma was admitted there on August 8, 2010, at 8.30 am and discharged the same day at 7.30 pm.
The next day, she complained of abdominal pain. On August 10, 2010, Sushma died.
Senior Police Inspector Samadhan Dhanedhar of the Saki Naka police station said police were waiting for the report of a committee of J J Hospital doctors to decide their next course of action. “We have sought the report to find out whether or not we can proceed against the hospital in a case like this. We are expecting the report soon.”
The Rotunda centre confirmed that Sushma had donated eggs thrice. However, Goral Gandhi, Vice-President, Operations, said she had registered with them as Sushma Dubey.
In an email, Gandhi wrote, “As per our SOPs, the PAN card is taken as the proof of age. When she first approached us in February 2009, she showed us a PAN card which reflected her age as 19 years.” Gandhi also wrote, “Subsequently we were informed by the police that she had produced a fake PAN card and withheld her correct name and age. We were advised by the police to keep a copy of all egg donors’ PAN cards, which we are now following.”
In the absence of a legislation to govern fertility clinics, the industry runs on guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical Research. According to the latest guidelines, an egg donor has to be between 21 and 35 years old. Gandhi, however, said the guidelines are periodically revised and when Sushma first approached them in 2009, the guidelines permitted women between the ages of 18 and 35 to donate eggs. The gap between donations has to be at least three months, which was followed in Sushma’s case. The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill, 2010 is yet to be tabled in Parliament.
Her family, which says it had no idea that Sushma donated eggs, blamed Sunil Chaumal, the owner of the scrap depot where Sushma worked, for her death. On August 11, 2010, her mother Pramila filed a complaint against Chaumal, accusing him of kidnapping and poisoning.
The family said Sushma had not returned home from work on August 7, 2010. “We went to Chaumal to ask where she had gone. He dissuaded us from filing a police complaint and said Sushma would come home,” Pramila told The Indian Express.
On August 9, the family says, Chaumal informed them that Sushma had been found but was feeling unwell. She was taken to a private doctor who asked the family to take her to Rajawadi Hospital. Sushma was brought home from the hospital that night. However, the next day too she complained of abdominal pain and was taken to the hospital again. “She was nearly unconscious and kept running her hand on her stomach,” Pramila said. She died in hospital the same day.
Post-mortem reports stated that there was one abrasion, four contusions and a blood clot in the head, plus six injection marks. “The probable cause of death, certified by the doctor, was shock possibly due to such multiple injuries,” the court said. However, it noted, “The histopathological report showed some congestion in ovaries and uterus.”
The police also learnt during the probe that a woman named Noorjahan posed as Sushma’s guardian and accompanied her to Rotunda. On August 9, she allegedly took Sushma to Govandi, and from there asked Chaumal to pick her up on August 9, 2010.
In her statement to the police, Noorjahan said that Sushma stayed in the house of one Iqbal Hussain on August 7 and an autorickshaw driver, Rakesh Bhat, dropped her to Bandra (where the clinic is located) the next day. Noorjahan said Samaullah had brought Sushma to the hospital. The role of Hussain, Bhatt and Noorjahan is unclear as the police have not booked any of them.
Sushma’s family also denies receiving any money from her egg donations, though police say she was paid Rs 25,000 each time. She had allegedly given the cheque she received in August 2010 to Noorjahan and said she would collect the cash a day later.
“If Sushma had donated ovum thrice, she should have been paid Rs 75,000. But we have not received a paisa of the money she earned,” Pramila said. She also denies knowing anyone called Noorjahan.

About egg donation
* It is a process in assisted reproduction in which the donor provides eggs, ova or oocytes for fertilisation in a laboratory. The donor is injected with stimulating hormones.
* Donors are classified ‘regular’ and ‘diva’. Diva donors are usually educated and from privileged backgrounds. They are paid as per their social standing, educational qualifications and physical appearance.
* As per ICMR guidelines, an egg donor has to be between 21 and 35 years. Apart from blood group and physical fitness, their height, weight, educational qualification, profession must be recorded.
* There has to be a gap of three months between donations.


Surrogate mom ‘retires’ after 10 children

Jill Hawkins
by Deccan Herald : Britain’s most prolific surrogate mother, who gave birth to 10 children, has announced her retirement from the baby business, agencies report from London.

Jill Hawkins, 47, insists premature twins Jacob and William will be the last children she carries over her 20-year “career”, Daily Mail reported. Her decision has been prompted by the serious complications she suffered during her pregnancy.

The twins were delivered via an emergency Caesarean eight weeks early. Jacob and William, are now in incubators in intensive care. Friday night Hawkins, who is single, said she is ending her career as a surrogate mother.

When she had her first baby for a couple, she lied to her bosses about the pregnancy.
She invented a boyfriend and then claimed the baby had died, causing her colleagues to send her sympathy cards. She insists being a surrogate mother is fulfilling and urges other women to consider it.